Popliteal-to-distal extreme bypass in endovascular era.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is characterized by rest pain and tissue loss, with an annual mortality rate of 20% and amputation rate of 40%, if not treated. Open bypass surgery is recommended in CLTI, depending on the availability of good quality venous material, outflow artery patency and surgical expertise. Aim of the study is to analyze primary patency, limb salvage and survival rate in patient undergoing popliteal-to-distal bypass. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent popliteal-to-distal bypass surgery between January 2016 and December 2021 were enrolled in the study. Primary outcomes were primary patency, limb salvage and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included amputation-free survival and secondary patency. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included during the study. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. Target outflow artery was in 27% (n. 13) of cases the anterior tibial artery in 27% (n. 13) dorsalis pedis, in 2% (n. 1) the peroneal artery, in 30% (n. 15) the retro-malleolar tibial artery, in 10% (n. 5) the medial plantar artery, in 4% (n. 2) the tarsal artery. Two-year primary patency was 85%±5. Secondary patency rates was 86%±3 at two years. The overall survival was 81% ±6 at 2 years, the amputation free survival was 70% ±9, and the limb salvage rate was 81% ±6. CONCLUSION: Popliteal-to-distal bypass require high technical expertise to be performed. When a good autologous vein and adequate outflow artery are present, they can be feasible with good patency rates, and overall survival.

Efficacy and Durability of Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization: A systematic review: Efficacy and durability of PDVA Review.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a novel technique aimed at salvaging peripheral arterial disease unamenable to conventional surgical intervention. This study aims to review contemporary literature on the efficacy, safety, and durability of DVA on patients with no-option critical limb ischaemia. METHODS: The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, using predefined search terms of "percutaneous deep vein arterialization" or "percutaneous deep venous arterialization" in PubMed, Web of Sciences, OvidSP, and EMBASE. Only studies with five or more patients were included, and studies involving open or hybrid DVA were excluded. The primary outcomes included technical success and primary amputation rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of wound healing, complication, re-intervention, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Ten studies encompassing a total of 233 patients were included. Patients were primarily those deemed to have no-option critical limb ischaemia. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range 1-63 months). The technical success rate was 97% (95% CI 96.2%-97.9%) and the major amputation rate was 21.8% (95% 21.1%-22.4%). The wound healing rate was 69.5% (95% CI 67.9-71.0%), complication rate was 13.8% (95% CI 11.7%-15.9%), reintervention rate was 37.4% (95% CI 34.9%-39.9%), and all-cause mortality rate was 15.7% (95% CI 14.1%-17.2%). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that endovascular DVA is safe for patients with no-option critical limb ischaemia. Nonetheless, studies were small with follow-up period of less than 1 year. There is currently lack of level 1 evidence to recommend routine use in patients with no-option critical limb ischaemia.

Factors Associated with Urgent Amputation Status and Its Impact on Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: Thirty-day mortality is higher after urgent major lower extremity amputations compared to elective lower extremity amputations. This study aims to identify factors associated with urgent amputations and to examine their impact on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality. METHODS: Patients undergoing major lower limb amputation from 2013-2020 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) were included. Urgent amputation was defined as occurring within 72 hours of admission. Associations with sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes including postoperative complication, inpatient death, and long-term survival were compared using univariable tests and multivariable logistic regression. Long-term survival between groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of the 12,874 patients included, 4,850 (37.7%) had urgent and 8,024 (62.3%) had elective amputations. Nonwhite patients required urgent amputation more often than white patients (39.8% vs 37.9%, P=0.03). A higher proportion of Medicaid and self-pay patients presented urgently (Medicaid:13.0% vs 11.0%; self-pay: 3.4% vs 2.5%, P< 0.001). Patients requiring urgent amputation were less often taking aspirin (55.6% vs 60.1%, P<0.001) or statin (62.2% vs 67.2%, P<0.001), had fewer prior revascularization procedures (41.0% vs 48.8%, P<0.001), and were of higher ASA class 4-5 (50.9% vs 40.1%, P<0.001). Urgent amputations were more commonly for uncontrolled infection (48.1% vs 29.4%, P< 0.001) or acute limb ischemia (14.3% vs 6.2%, P<0.001). Post-operative complications were higher after urgent amputations (34.7% vs 16.6%, P<0.001), including need for return to operating room (23.8% vs 8.4%, P< 0.001) and need for higher revision (15.2% vs 4.5%, P<0.001). Inpatient mortality was higher after urgent amputation (8.9% vs 5.4%, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed non-white race, self-pay, homelessness, current smoking, ASA class 4-5, and amputations for uncontrolled infection or acute limb ischemia were associated with urgent status, whereas living in a nursing home or prior revascularization were protective. Further, urgent amputation was associated with an increased odds of postoperative complication or death (OR 1.86 [1.69-2.04], P<0.001) as well as long-term mortality (OR: 1.24 [1.13-1.35], P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis corroborated that elective status was associated with improvement of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring urgent amputations are more often nonwhite, uninsured, and less frequently had prior revascularization procedures, revealing disparities in access to care. Urgency was associated with a higher post-operative complication rate, as well as increased long-term mortality. Efforts should be directed towards reducing these disparities to improve outcomes following amputation.

Analysis Of Oklahoma Amputation Trends and Identification of Risk Factors to Target Areas For Limb Preservation Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Annual trends of lower extremity amputation due to end-stage chronic disease are on the rise in the United States. These amputations are leading to massive expenses for patients and the medical system. In Oklahoma, we have a high-risk population because access to care is low, the number of uninsured is high, cardiovascular health is poor, and our overall healthcare performance is ranked 50th in the country. But we know little about Oklahomans and their risk of limb loss. It is, therefore, imperative to look closely at this population to discover contemporary rates, trends, and state-specific risk factors for amputation due to diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We hypothesize that state-specific groups will be identified as having the highest risk for limb loss and that contemporary trends in amputations are rising. To create implementable solutions to limb preservation, a baseline must be set. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a 12-consecutive-year observational study using Oklahoma's hospital discharge data. Discharges among patients 20 years or older with a primary or secondary diagnosis of diabetes and/or PAD were included. Diagnoses and amputation procedures were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Amputation rates were calculated per 1,000 discharges. Trends in amputation rates were measured by annual percentage changes (APC). Prevalence ratios evaluated the differences in amputation rates across demographic groups. RESULTS: Over 5,000,000 discharges were identified from 2008-2019. Twenty-four percent had a diagnosis of diabetes and/or PAD. The overall amputation rate was 12 per thousand discharges for those with diabetes and/or PAD. Diabetes and/or PAD-related amputation rates increased from 8.1 to 16.2 (APC: 6.0, 95% CI:4.7-7.3). Most amputations were minor (59.5%), and though minor increased at a faster rate compared to major (minor amputation APC: 8.1, 95% CI: 6.7-9.6 vs. major amputation APC: 3.1, 95% CI:1.5-4.7), major amputations were notable in that they were significantly increasing. Amputation rates were the highest among males (16.7), American Indians (19.2), uninsured (21.2), non-married patients (12.7), and patients between 45 and 49 years of age (18.8), and calculated prevalence ratios for each were significant (p=0.001) when compared within their respective category. CONCLUSION: Amputation rates in Oklahoma have nearly doubled in 12 years, with both major and minor amputations significantly increasing. This study describes a worsening trend, underscoring that amputations due to chronic disease is an urgent statewide healthcare problem. We also present imperative examples of amputation healthcare disparities. By defining these state-specific areas and populations at risk, we have identified areas to pursue and improve care. These distinctive risk factors will help to frame a statewide limb preservation intervention.

Limb Salvage Surgery for Ponatinib-Induced Bilateral Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in a Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with T315I Mutation in BCR-ABL: A Case Report.

A 72-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia with T315I mutation in breakpoint cluster region-abelson (BCR-ABL) was treated with ponatinib. During the course of her treatment, chronic limb-threatening ischemia developed in both lower extremities, and the left lower extremity was amputated below the knee at a previous hospital. She was referred to our department for salvage of the right lower extremity. We performed a foot bypass and multidisciplinary treatment of the wound, and achieved epithelialization in about 1 month. The rate of vascular occlusive events with ponatinib has been reported to be high, and we believe that careful monitoring is important during use.

The integration of ortho-plastic limb salvage teams in the humanitarian response to violence-related open tibial fractures: evaluating outcomes in the Gaza Strip.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage by ortho-plastic teams is the standard protocol for treating open tibial fractures in high-income countries, but there's limited research on this in conflict settings like the Gaza Strip. This study assessed the clinical impact of gunshot-related open tibial fractures, compared patient management by orthopedic and ortho-plastic teams, and identified the risk factors for bone non-union in this context. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted on Gaza Strip patients with gunshot-induced-open tibial fractures from March 2018 to October 2020. Data included patient demographics, treatments, and outcomes, with at least one year of follow-up. Primary outcomes were union, non-union, infection, and amputation. RESULTS: The study included 244 injured individuals, predominantly young adult males (99.2%) with nearly half (48.9%) having Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures and more than half (66.8%) with over 1 cm of bone loss. Most patients required surgery, including rotational flaps and bone grafts with a median of 3 admissions and 9 surgeries. Ortho-plastic teams managed more severe muscle and skin injuries, cases with bone loss > 1 cm, and performed less debridement compared to other groups, though these differences were not statistically significant. Non-union occurred in 53% of the cases, with the ortho-plastic team having the highest rate at 63.6%. Infection rates were high (92.5%), but no significant differences in bone or infection outcomes were observed among the different groups. Logistic regression analysis identified bone loss > 1 cm, vascular injury, and the use of a definitive fixator at the first application as predictors of non-union. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the severity and complexity of such injuries, emphasizing their significant impact on patients and the healthcare system. Ortho-plastic teams appeared to play a crucial role in managing severe cases. However, further research is still needed to enhance our understanding of how to effectively manage these injuries.

Influence of Inframalleolar Modifier P0/P1 on Wound Healing in Bypass Surgery versus Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the influence of inframalleolar (IM) P0/P1 on wound healing in bypass surgery versus endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the multicenter data of patients who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2022. IM P represents target artery crossing into foot, with intact pedal arch (P0) and absent or severely diseased pedal arch (P1). The endpoints were wound healing, limb salvage (LS), and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 66 and 189 propensity score-matched pairs in the IM P0 and IM P1 cohorts, respectively. In the IM P0 cohort, the 1-year wound healing rates were 94.5% and 85.7% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (p = .092), whereas those in the IM P1 cohort were 86.2% and 66.2% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (p < .001). In the IM P0 cohort, the 2-year LS rates were 96.7% and 94.1% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (p = .625), and those in the IM P1 cohort were 91.8% and 81.5% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (p = .004). No significant differences were observed between the bypass surgery and EVT in terms of postoperative complication rates in either the IM P0 or P1 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Bypass surgery facilitated better wound healing and LS than EVT in patients with IM P1. Conversely, no differences in wound healing or LS were observed between groups in patients with IM P0. Bypass surgery should be considered a better revascularization strategy than EVT in patients with tissue loss and IM P1 disease.

Functional and oncological outcomes of patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage.

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in skeletally immature patients. The proximal humerus is the third most common site of osteosarcoma. The literature shows a paucity of published data concerning the outcome of proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage. The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) do patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy show good functional and oncological outcomes, and (2) are there any prognostic factors that are associated with better oncological and functional outcomes? MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective case series study assessing the overall outcome of 34 patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma. Eighteen patients were males (53%) while 16 were females. Biological reconstruction was done in 15 patients (44%), while nonbiological reconstruction was done in 19 patients. Resections were mainly intraarticular (82%). Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, while oncological outcome was assessed based on local recurrence and development of chest metastasis. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. To compare categorical data, the chi-square (χ2) test was performed. The exact test was used instead when the expected frequency was less than 5. Correlations between quantitative variables were examined using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean MSTS score was 25.5 (range 23-29). A younger age was statistically correlated with a poorer MSTS score (P = 0.0016). Six patients out of 34 (17.6%) had local recurrence and four of them (67%) were treated by forequarter amputation. 41% of patients developed chest metastasis, and the majority of them were treated by chemotherapy (71%). In comparison with patients with osteosarcoma at other sites who were also managed in our institution, proximal humerus osteosarcoma patients showed higher incidence rates of local recurrence and chest metastasis along with lower 5-year patient and limb survivorships compared to distal femur, proximal tibia and proximal femur osteosarcoma patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment of osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus by limb salvage and chemotherapy yields a good functional outcome. The method of reconstruction does not impact the resultant function. The 5-year survivorship of these patients is 65%. Younger patients have a better oncological outcome and an inferior functional outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV therapeutic study.

The surgical management and oncologic outcomes of patients with fungating soft tissue sarcoma treated at a tertiary cancer centre and review of literature.

Background: Currently there is limited literature available on fungating soft tissue sarcoma and its effect of outcomes. In the current study we evaluated the surgical management and oncologic outcomes of patient with fungating soft tissue sarcoma. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with fungating sarcoma between January 2015 till January 2019 at a tertiary cancer care centre. A total of 59 patients were considered of which 16 had metastasis at presentation. The duration of symptoms prior to presentation averaged 10.2 months (median, 7.2months; range, 1-57 months). Median tumor length was 10 cm. Results: 56% patients underwent amputation and 44% were treated with limb salvage. Following limb salvage surgery in10 cases primary closure of defect was performed and 6 cases required skin grafting for closure of defect. In 6 patients local flap was used for coverage of defect and 4 patients required free flap surgery. Two-year overall survival (OS) of the study cohort were 52.2% and 58% respectively. Two-year disease free survival (DFS) and OS in 43 non metastatic patients at presentation was seen in 58%(95% CI,38%-74%) and 66.5%(95% CI,42%-81%) respectively. The two-year disease OS in 16 patients with metastasis at presentation was 33.2 %. On univariate analysis, tumor size and metastatic at presentation had significant effect on survival. Conclusion: Tumor size and metastatic at presentation has significant impact on survival in these patients. The oncologic outcomes including Disease free survival, overall survival and local recurrence rates similar amongst the two surgical modalities (amputation versus limb salvage). Amputation rates are more amongst fungating soft tissue sarcoma but limb salvage can be attempted whenever feasible keeping tumor free surgical margins under consideration.

Preliminary Experience With Commercially Available Trabecular Metal Tibial Cones Combined With a Retrograde Locked Intramedullary Nail for Bony Defects in Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis.

Critical sized bone defects in the ankle are becoming increasingly more common in patients undergoing limb reconstruction with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Bulk allografts have not fared well over time. There have been scattered preliminary reports using custom spinal cages or 3D-printed Titanium Implants to address the critical bony defect; however, the cost of these devices is prohibitive in many clinical practice settings. The purpose of this investigation is to report the preliminary experience using a commercially available Trabecular Metal (Zimmer-Biomet) tibial metaphyseal cone combined with a retrograde locked intramedullary nail to address this challenging problem. Eight consecutive patients underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a commercially available Trabecular Metal tibial metaphyseal cone combined with a retrograde locked intramedullary nail. Five developed bone loss secondary to neuropathic (Charcot) bony resorption and 3 underwent surgery for failed total ankle arthroplasty. All 8 patients eventually achieved clinical and radiographic healing and were able to ambulate with standard footwear. One patient developed a postoperative wound infection at the site of calcaneal locking screws, which resolved with debridement and parenteral antibiotic therapy. Critical bone defects about the ankle have successfully addressed with custom 3D titanium implants. This small series suggests that similar clinical outcomes can be achieved with the use of a commercially available porous tantalum metaphyseal spacer borrowed from our arthroplasty colleagues, combined with the use of a retrograde locked intramedullary nail.Levels of Evidence: Level 4: Retrospective case series.

Outcomes of Endovascular and Open Surgical Therapy for Popliteal Artery Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Popliteal arterial injury carries an appreciable risk of limb loss and, despite advances in stent and stent-graft technology, endovascular therapy for popliteal arterial trauma is infrequently used when compared with traditional open repair. Thus, this study aims to assess outcomes of endovascular management (EM) with open surgery (OS) as a historical reference. METHODS: An electronic search was performed (from January 2010 until June 2023) using multiple databases. Initial records were screened against eligibility criteria. Next, the full-text manuscript of articles that passed the title and abstract assessment was reviewed for relevancy of data points. Data from articles passing the inclusion criteria was extracted and tabulated. Comparative analysis was completed by performing chi-square tests and two-sampled t-tests (Welch's). RESULTS: The twenty-four selected studies described 864 patients (96 EM; 768 OS). In the endovascular group, patients underwent procedures primarily for blunt trauma using covered, self-expanding stents, resulting in universal technical success and patency. Patients had an average LOS 7.99 ± 7.5 days and follow-up time of 33.0 ± 7.0 months, with 21% undergoing fasciotomies, 6% undergoing amputation, and 4% having pseudoaneurysms. Patients in the open surgery group were evenly divided between blunt and penetrating trauma, chiefly undergoing vein graft interposition and exhibiting fasciotomy and amputation rates of 66% and 24%, respectively. Patients had an average LOS of 5.66 ± 4.6 days and a 96% survival rate at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence sheds light on the nature of treatment offered by endovascular management and open surgery treatment and suggests endovascular management is associated with several important positive outcomes. Although it is difficult to directly compare endovascular and open surgical techniques, the data with respect to open surgical management of popliteal artery trauma can still provide a powerful frame of reference for the outcomes of endovascular management to date. However, this claim is weak due to the little published data for endovascular management of popliteal trauma, publication bias accompanying the published studies, and general, selection bias. Additional prospective data is necessary to define patients who specifically benefit from endovascular repair.

Pediatric Peripheral Vascular Trauma: Incidence and Outcomes.

Peripheral vascular trauma (PVT) is rare in children, with an incidence estimated below 1%. We studied pediatric PVT and risk factors for major amputation by accessing the 2019 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Demographics, injury type and location, trauma center capability, injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), and major amputation rates were evaluated. Statistical analysis included chi-square testing for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Of 130,554 pediatric trauma patients, 1196 (.9%) had 1460 upper extremity (UE) and lower extremity (LE) PVT. Patients were predominantly male (n = 933, 78%) with a mean age of 14 years. Most patients suffered penetrating injury (n = 744, 62.2%). The most common vessels injuries were radial (n = 198, 13.6%) and femoral (n = 196, 13.4%). Major amputation occurred in 2.6% of patients (n = 31). Patients who suffered blunt injury (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.5; P = .004) and lower limb PVT (OR, 11.1; 95% CI, 3.3-37.9, P = .0001) had higher odds of amputation.

Tips and Tricks for Simple and Complex Below-the-Ankle Punctures.

CLINICAL IMPACT: When the standard endovascular crossing maneuvers have failed during CLTI recanalization procedures and the distal below-the-knee or proximal below-the-ankle retrograde access is not possible due to chronic occlusion of the vessels, mastering the more distal and complex retrograde BTA punctures may be advantageous.There are scanty reports regarding the retrograde puncture of the mid and forefoot vessels. The aim of this article is to review different tips and tricks related to these techniques to help operators to apply them in specific scenarios to eventually improve procedural success rate.

Impact of Level of Surgery on the Functional Outcomes in Patients with Lower Extremity Bone Tumors Undergoing Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Surgery.

Limb salvage surgery is the preferred treatment for bone tumors in the current surgical practice. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between amputation and limb salvage surgery based on the level of surgery at two levels: knee and hip. A single institutional analysis of 137 patients with lower extremity bone tumors was done between 2014 and 2020. Eighty-seven patients treated with amputation were compared with 50 patients treated with limb salvage surgery based on following variables: age, gender, histology, anatomic site, and MSTS score. The mean MSTS scores were fairly better in patients who underwent surgery at knee level compared to those who underwent surgery at hip level. The mean MSTS score at 1-year follow-up was 22.0 in amputation group compared to 22.4 in limb salvage group, whereas at 2-year follow-up was 24.1 in amputation group compared to 25.1 in limb salvage group. At knee level, functional outcomes were similar after amputation and limb salvage. At hip level, patients undergoing amputation had poorer MSTS scores compared to limb salvage surgery at 2-year follow-up (p = 0.04). The functional outcomes for patients undergoing surgery at knee level were similar irrespective of type of surgery. At longer follow-up, patients undergoing amputation at hip level had a poorer functional outcome compared to limb salvage surgery. Although limb salvage was associated with similar MSTS scores when compared with amputation, it produced a better functional outcome especially for proximally located tumors.

Management of the Mangled Extremity.

Mangled extremities represent one of the most challenging injuries. They indicate the need for a comprehensive trauma assessment to rule out coexisting injuries. Treatment options include amputation and attempts at limb salvage. Although both have been associated with chronic disability, new surgical techniques and evolving rehabilitation options offer hope for the future.

Complications after limb salvage surgeries for musculoskeletal malignancies: 10-year experience of the main sarcoma center in Bulgaria.

INTRODUCTION: Limb salvage surgery is currently the most frequently used treatment option in Bulgaria for individuals with musculoskeletal malignancies. Clinical data about complications from these procedures is limited in the country, with only a few studies currently available.

Comparison of Two Techniques for Proximal Margin Analysis of Toe Amputations: A Retrospective Review.

Toe amputations are a common podiatric procedure for treatment of osteomyelitis. Whether or not the surgeon obtains a surgical cure, thus resolving the infection, can be difficult to assess. Obtaining a proximal bone margin can assist the treatment team in deciding the duration of postoperative antibiotics, need for reoperation, and postoperative care. The two senior surgeons use different methods to analyze proximal bone margins. The first surgeon obtains a microbiologic culture from the remaining bone, either at the proximal phalanx or metatarsal head, following the removal of the toe to be reviewed for osteomyelitis. Per the second surgeon's technique, the pathologist only analyzes the proximal aspect of the amputated toe for presence of osteomyelitis. Our goal is to analyze the reoperation and reamputation rates between the techniques in which the proximal margin specimens are obtained. A retrospective chart review was performed on all isolated toe or partial toe amputations from March 2017 to September 2022. There were 115 patients who met inclusion criteria. Reoperation and reamputation rates were analyzed for positive and negative infection margins from intraoperative cultures. Our study found an overall 28% reoperation rate and 26% reamputation rate for the negative margins group. In the positive proximal margin group, there was an overall 48% reoperation rate and 44% reamputation rate. Our analysis did not find a statistically significant difference between the reamputation rate in the negative margins group and the reamputation rate in the positive margins group. In conclusion, our study found that a positive proximal margin for osteomyelitis exhibited a nearly double reoperation and reamputation rate compared to patients with a negative margin, and that one margin analysis technique was not inferior to the other in regards to the need for additional surgeries.

From a Spark to a Flame: The Evolution of Diabetic Foot Disease in the Last Two Decades.

Despite many improvements have been achieved, diabetic foot disease (DFD) remains a clinical, social, and economic burden. In the last years, DFD showed an evolution of its characteristics with an increase of the ischaemic/neuro-ischaemic foot in comparison to the pure neuropathic foot. Simultaneously, there was and increased incidence of concomitant cardiovascular co-morbidities, which influences the higher fragility of patients with DFS. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in subjects with diabetic foot seems to show a more aggressive pattern, being more distal and difficult to treat. Untreatable PAD remains the unmet need for clinicians and the main risk factor of major amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Authors aimed to describe the evolution of diabetic foot patients in the last two decades, describing also the current and future treatment which may improve outcomes in the next generations.

Application of Novosorb biodegradable temporising matrix in wounds of different aetiologies: a case series.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Effect of a multidisciplinary team approach in patients with diabetic foot ulcers on major adverse limb events (MALEs): systematic review and meta-analysis for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.

The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs.